7 Reasons Why PhishGrid Beats PhishMe in the Fight Against Phishing
PhishGrid and PhishMe are both phishing simulation and training platforms that are used to help organizations protect against phishing attacks. Both platforms offer a range of tools and features to help businesses simulate phishing attacks and train employees on how to identify and avoid these scams.
One key difference between PhishGrid and PhishMe is the focus of their platforms. PhishGrid focuses on providing comprehensive phishing simulations and training, while PhishMe offers a broader range of tools and services that include threat intelligence and incident response capabilities.
Another difference is the pricing and pricing models of the two platforms. PhishGrid offers a subscription-based pricing model with different tiers of service depending on the needs of the organization. PhishMe, on the other hand, offers a customized pricing model that is tailored to the specific needs and requirements of each customer.
In terms of features and capabilities, both platforms offer similar tools and services for phishing simulations and training. This includes the ability to customize simulations, track employee responses, and provide detailed reporting and analysis. However, PhishGrid offers more advanced features for simulating complex phishing attacks, such as spear phishing and business email compromise. PhishMe, on the other hand, offers a broader range of tools and services that include threat intelligence and incident response capabilities.
Feature comparison between PhishGrid & PhishMe
Below is detailed comparison between both platform
Features | PhishGrid | PhishMe |
Learners | ||
Import from CSV | Yes | Yes |
Import from LDAP | Yes | – |
Vulnerability Score of a Learner | Yes | No |
Export Learners | Yes | – |
Group Learners | Yes | – |
Awareness Content + Template Creation | ||
Customization | Yes | Yes |
Clone by URL | v1.5 | – |
Clone by forwarding EMails | v1.5 | – |
Conversational Emails | v2 | – |
Phish Rate | Yes | Yes |
Advance editor | Yes | – |
Campaigns | ||
Multiple templates | Yes | – |
Send Instantly | Yes | – |
Schedule for date/time | Yes | No |
Schedule for period | Yes | – |
Advance editor | Yes | – |
Custom Email Templates | Yes | Yes |
Attachment in Emails | Yes | Yes |
Emails without Phishing Notice | Yes | Yes |
Custom Domains | Yes | – |
Spear Phishing Support | Yes | Yes |
Malware Support | Yes | Yes |
Vishing | Yes | No |
SMS | Yes | Yes |
Ransomware | ||
Encrypt files | Yes | – |
Allow persistence | Yes | – |
Custom Messages | Yes | – |
Reporting | ||
Customizable | Yes, every point | – |
Reports by latest hits | Yes | – |
Formats | PDF, CSV, HTML | – |
Timestamps | Yes | Yes |
Geolocations | Yes | Yes |
Responses by days/hours | Partially | Yes |
Times-pent on training | No | Yes |
Browser/OS/Version | Yes | – |
Conclusion
Both PhishGrid and PhishMe are valuable tools for organizations seeking protection against phishing attacks. The choice between the two platforms depends on specific needs, requirements, and pricing models of each platform. PhishGrid excels in advanced threat intelligence, while PhishMe offers comprehensive training and education modules.
By understanding the pricing and pricing models of both platforms, organizations can make an informed decision that best suits their financial considerations and aligns with their overall goals and requirements.